If I may suggest a slight change/suggestion to the idea. Archways will not close if someone was actively using them when the owner of the archway left. This way if someone else was living in a sub archway they're not forced out of it.
There's no point in having completely inactive archways but archways that are inhabited/in use by someone other than the person the archway is connected to can make for some really REALLY interesting RP.
Re: Questions
There's no point in having completely inactive archways but archways that are inhabited/in use by someone other than the person the archway is connected to can make for some really REALLY interesting RP.